[f]→[pʰ]Certainty: 4/5Commonality: 2/5
Voiceless labiodental fricative to Voiceless aspirated bilabial plosive
The phonetic shift from the voiceless labiodental fricative /f/ to the voiceless aspirated bilabial plosive /pʰ/ is an attested, though less common, sound change. This transformation primarily represents a form of fortition, where a fricative strengthens into a plosive. It often involves a change in the place of articulation from labiodental to bilabial, accompanied by the addition of aspiration. This shift is frequently observed in the adaptation of loanwords into languages that lack the /f/ sound in their native phonological inventory, or as a regular dialectal correspondence.
Phonetic Effects
Fortition, Change in Place of Articulation, Addition of Aspiration
Language Examples
/f/→/pʰ/— English loanwords with /f/ are adapted to /pʰ/ (e.g., "phone" becomes /pʰon/).
/f/→/pʰ/— Borrowed /f/ changes to /pʰ/.
[f]→[pʰ]— The voiceless labiodental fricative [f] in Chittagonian corresponds to the Bangla voiceless aspirated bilabial plosive [pʰ].
/f/→/pʰ/— In colloquial speech, /f/ may be simplified to /pʰ/. Some Korean borrowings also convert /f/ to /pʰ/.
/f/→/pʰ/— /f/ is pronounced as /pʰ/.
Related Transformations
More Germanic Shifts
Sources & References
- Fortition - Grokipedia
- THE RISE AND FALL OF ASPIRATED FRICATIVES* - Canadian Linguistic Association
- Historical Chinese phonology - Wikipedia
- Why did voiceless plosives Θ/Φ/Χ (originally aspirated t/p/k) become fricatives instead of merging with unaspirated τ/π/κ? - Quora
- THE PHONOLOGY OF PROTO-TAI A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfi
- Linguistic - Chinese University of Hong Kong
- ... change .......................................................................... 254 6.3.1 Segment-tone interaction ................. ... f- to /pʰ-/ is found in Aiton, Phake, etc. CT dialects, in general, show the second line of development. In Lungchow, Debao, Lungming, Shangsi, Daxin, Jingxi, etc., the reflex of *w- is /f-/ but the reflex of PT *ʰw- is /pʰ-/. This indicates that *ʰw- did not become *w- when the original voiceless sonorants became voiced. Instead, PT *ʰwmust have developed into /pʰ-/ before the ...
- Translation and commentary on Adjarian 1911 `Armenian dialectology' - George Balabanian
- Dzongkha - Grokipedia
- In Hindi, [pʰ] and [f] are considered the same, but seem like completely different sounds. Is there a reason for or any literature about this? : r/linguistics - Reddit
- Phi - Grokipedia
- Froto-Semitic - Benjamin Suchard
- Aspirated consonant - Wikipedia
- Aspiration - FrathWiki
- PERSO-ARABIC LOANWORDS IN HINDUSTANI PART II. LINGUISTIC STUDY - ResearchGate
- Is there a rule or history for the use of 'ph' in place of 'f' in the spelling of words in English?
- The CSLU Labeling Guide - LDC Catalog
- Plosive - Wikipedia
- What's the strangest sound shift you've ever seen in a language? : r/linguistics - Reddit
- Chittagonian phrasebook - Wikitravel
- The Bangkok Hakka Phonology
- a preliminary phonology and latin-based orthography of para naga (jejara), northwest myanmar - eVols
- Nuqta - Grokipedia
Spotted a mistake or have a better example?
EchoDrift is community-driven. You can suggest a change directly through GitHub.
Propose an Edit on GitHub