The Universal Atlas of Phonetic Evolution
Back to Matrix [j] → [v] Edit this Data

[v]→[j]Certainty: 2/5Commonality: 1/5

Voiced labiodental fricative to Voiced palatal approximant

The change from voiced labiodental fricative [v] to palatal glide [j] would require both a large shift in place of articulation (labiodental → palatal) and a manner change (fricative → approximant). No direct v→j change is attested as a regular sound change in any documented language family. The closest well-documented interaction is in cluster simplification: sequences of /v/ + /j/ (as in English 'view' /vjuː/) can be reduced to [j] through yod-absorption in casual speech, but this is a cluster reduction, not a standalone v→j rule. The preamble's claim that this 'is most likely before /i/ or /j/' is consistent with that reanalysis but not with a direct phonological change.

Phonetic Effects

Palatalization, Lenition, Glide Formation

Language Examples

/vj/ in 'view' [vjuː], 'virtue' [ˈvjɜːtʃu]→[juː], [ˈjɜːtʃu] (cluster simplification in rapid speech)— In some varieties of informal English, the initial /vj/ sequence can reduce to [j] through yod-absorption. This is not a regular phonological rule but rather a casual speech reduction. It parallels the better-documented /tj/ → [tʃ] and /dj/ → [dʒ] patterns but produces glide output rather than an affricate. The original /v/ in 'view' is historically from Latin 'videre'.

Related Transformations

Spotted a mistake or have a better example?

EchoDrift is community-driven. You can suggest a change directly through GitHub.

Propose an Edit on GitHub